What is the default behavior when rules conflict regarding user access?

When discussing the default behavior for user access conflicts in Workday Adaptive Planning, the selection of most permissive access is based on the principle of ensuring users have the widest range of needed functionalities and data visibility while still operating within the system's security framework. This approach allows users to access the features and information that they require to perform their jobs effectively, encouraging efficiency and productivity.

In environments where different rules or permissions may create a clash, applying the most permissive access ensures that legitimate users are not inadvertently locked out due to overlapping or conflicting access rules. By doing so, organizations can balance security needs with user requirements to optimize operational processes.

The other choices, such as most restrictive or most flexible access, would hinder user functionality more than needed, potentially restricting users from accessing critical data or functionality they should reasonably be permitted to access. No access granted outright would be too severe, preventing users from completing essential tasks altogether. Thus, the system's design inclines towards granting the most permissive access to accommodate user needs effectively while maintaining necessary security protocols.